Subject: Re: My favourite XSLT enhancement requests From: "Lassi A. Tuura" <lat@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:54:52 +0200 |
> In other words, dynamically scoped variables (instead of or > in addition to to statically scoped ones) Yes. Perl calls them `local', I think. You have a point in that they are out of fashion, probably for a good reason. I have to admit that I wouldn't ask for them if there was a less lengthy parameter passing syntax. Anyone for Michael Kay's suggestion of functions defined as templates (just recenly, IIRC xsl:function was his proposal)? They would be most cool! And do away with almost all of my named templates... And wonder of wonders, parameters would be easier to pass and most likely I wouldn't be asking for this feature :-) Even if templates-as-functions existed, I'd probably be asking to be able to construct the function name dynamically for multi-choice dispatching. An evaluate() function would solve that very nicely. Together with the templates as functions it would make a most useful tool! Cheers, //lat -- Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: My favourite XSLT enhancement r, Joe English | Thread | Re: My favourite XSLT enhancement r, Alexey Gokhberg |
Re: Singleton Tag Replacement, Jeni Tennison | Date | OASIS XSLT/XPath Conformance San Jo, G. Ken Holman |
Month |