Subject: Re: XSLT V 1.1 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 22:58:22 GMT |
> This solution wouldn't handle situations where there are multiple documents > being accessed through the same document() call: true, which is of course part of the problem with the current setup you require document() sum() etc to work on multiplr nodes because if you use xslt constructs such as for-each to collect the nodes together you end up with an rtf rather than a node set, which is no fun. having a way to (portably) define functions usable in xpath rather than via a named template call would solve many problems (and allow Paul a "simpler document()" function as extra functionality could then be built up within a stylesheet. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT V 1.1, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: XSLT V 1.1, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Test (Again), uche . ogbuji | Date | Article on using XSLT for Validatio, uche . ogbuji |
Month |