Subject: RE: MSXML v. Saxon - whose bug? From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:42:24 +0100 |
> I found the fact that foo/bar and foo/* have the same priority to be a > bit counter-intuitive given the general thrust that more specific > matches should have higher priority > There are even more counter-intuitive examples, for example "//node()" has higher priority than "section". Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: MSXML v. Saxon - whose bug?, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: XSL vs. XSLT, different syntax?, Yenhooi Tan |
RE: for-each--stuck on very basic i, Kay Michael | Date | RE: Using xsl:if to determine if a , Kay Michael |
Month |