Subject: RE: testing node type From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:26:31 +0200 |
> Linda van den Brink wrote: > > comment() and processing-instruction() > > > As I understand these are not functions but Node Tests, > part of XPath. > > Mentioned in chapter 6 of XSLT Programmer's reference, and > defined in > > section 2.3 of XPath. > > Herrumphh. They look like functions to me! > *and* they are not in the index! > > (page 372, well buried). Indexed as node test. Sigh. > And DC thinks he gets it wrong occasionally ;-) > > Thanks Linda. > > New 'bit' for the reference card Tony? I don't want to upset you, David, but they're on the XSLT and XPath Quick reference as well (I assume that's what you're talking about). Again, look under node tests... Sorry ;-) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: testing node type, Tony Graham | Thread | RE: testing node type, Pawson, David |
RE: "Roots" of confusion introduced, DuCharme, Robert | Date | RE: "Roots" of confusion introduced, Pawson, David |
Month |