RE: testing node type

Subject: RE: testing node type
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:06:49 +0100
> > > >   <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]">
> > I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as
> So, implementor out there,
> can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster?

In Saxon they do follow different paths in the code, but the access path is
the same in both cases, so I can't think of any reason why one should
perform better than the other.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread