RE: testing node type

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: testing node type

Subject: RE: testing node type
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:06:49 +0100

> > > >   <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]">
> > I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as
well.
> 
> So, implementor out there,
> can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster?

In Saxon they do follow different paths in the code, but the access path is
the same in both cases, so I can't think of any reason why one should
perform better than the other.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: testing node type, (continued) Kay Michael - Sat, 23 Sep 2000 12:44:02 +0100 Kay Michael - Sat, 23 Sep 2000 12:47:45 +0100 Kay Michael - Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:04:44 +0100 Nick Browne - Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:26:59 +0100 Kay Michael - Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:06:49 +0100 <= Sebastian Rahtz - Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:39:46 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: testing node type, Nick Browne	Thread	RE: testing node type, Sebastian Rahtz
Re: (2 xpath questions), Taras Tielkes	Date	RE: (2 xpath questions), Kay Michael
	Month