Re: (2 xpath questions)

Subject: Re: (2 xpath questions)
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:30:46 +0100
Hello Taras,

At 11:52 PM 9/25/00 +0200, you wrote:
>> Neither "//"
>> nor ".//" is a valid XPath query.
>But *why* is "//" an invalid query? What are the rules for validity, and
>which ones get broken?
>Any what's wrong with ".//"? This works with MSXML (not that *that* means
>something), and will return the same as "descendant-or-self::node()" for the
>context node.

Well, if MSXML lets you do ".//", yes, that's a bug.

"//" is short not for "/descendant-or-self::node()", but for
"/descendant-or-self::node()/" (note the slash at the end).

That's why "//leaf" works -- "/descendant-or-self::node()leaf" wouldn't
work, but "/descendant-or-self::node()/leaf" would (it's short for
>I really hope I'm wrong though, since I'm going to buy your book this week

Yep, you are, you can buy Mike's book safely.


Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.      
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread