Subject: Re: New XSL working draft published From: Rick Geimer <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:43:58 -0700 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > PPS I am slightly surprised to find no DTD referred to in the XML > file. It renders XSLT processing interesting, as I had naively assumed > I could use the id() function, and of course I can't.... > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: New XSL working draft published, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: New XSL working draft published, Rick Geimer |
Re: New XSL working draft published, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: Xalan namespace problem, Dinesh Ajmera |
Month |