Subject: Re: New XSL working draft published From: Rick Geimer <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:02:30 -0700 |
Oops, I just realized that you were refering to the lack of a DTD in the XML version of the XSL specification document, not the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO. Anyway, it seems like they just don't like DTDs in general. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Rick Geimer wrote: > > Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > > PPS I am slightly surprised to find no DTD referred to in the XML > > file. It renders XSLT processing interesting, as I had naively assumed > > I could use the id() function, and of course I can't.... > > > > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? > > Rick Geimer > National Semiconductor > rick.geimer@xxxxxxx > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: New XSL working draft published, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: New XSL working draft published, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: How To Access a param from sty, Weakliem, Gordon | Date | Re: writing to html files us, Christophe Lauret |
Month |