Subject: Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type) From: Richard Light <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 07:39:42 +0000 |
In message <20001124042119.1885.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes >Will it not be simpler just to use SAXON -- it recognises tail >recursion and implements it using iteration -- therefore no stack >overflow will occur. Thanks - I didn't know that. I must say, I always see it is a bit of a defeat for the principle of XSLT when the answer to a question is "use processor X". Anyway, it looks as though the "Char node-type Party" doesn't have much popular support ... Richard. Richard Light SGML/XML and Museum Information Consultancy richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Implementing recursion (Was Re: Cha, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle |
RE: A new XSL Formatter, Tokushige Kobayashi | Date | Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle |
Month |