RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon

["Nanto, Dan" <dnanto@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We have been evaluating both Saxon and Xalan, and have not seen much of a
performance difference.  We are currently planning on using xalan.  Did you
see a large performance difference between the two?  Were you using this at
run time of from the command line?  Any input would be greatly appreciated!

-Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Messineo, Chris [mailto:CMessineo@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:22 AM
To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon


I made the change from Xalan to Saxon, and did not have to change any of my
xslt pages.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Herschke [mailto:robert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:21 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: switching from xalan (J) to saxon


 Hello everybody,
 
 For performance reasons we will switch our renderer from xalan to saxon
 soon.
 Perhaps somebody has done this too.
 
 My questions:
 
 - are there some tables or lists of xsl-constructs that doesn't match in
 this two processors ?
 
 - are there known issues, like "Do not use this in saxon, as you do it in
 xalan"?
 
 - does anybody know something about conversions between XSL-files written
 for Xalan to XSL-Files converted for Saxon?
 
 --- or are there 100% compatibility between the constructs in XSL-files?
 
 Thanks for your help in advance!
 Robert



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list