| Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:44:00 GMT | 
> no thanks David. I've been trapped into proprietary corners before. do you use xt:node-set() or saxon:line-number() ? Since I know the answer is yes, I'm not sure what you have against evil-empire:script? > I had my last mail quarantined, so it's not just me. I wrote to postmaster@... and complained. Why are they puuting xsl in quarantine? > Bring the common ones into mainstream XSL > and keep out scripting. but waiting for XSLT version n+1 will always be too slow. A common extension namespace would be a much lighter weight mechanism for having common built in extensions. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton | 
| RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson | Date | [xsl] Client side processing with S, Brand_Niemann | 
| Month |