Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:39:25 +0000 |
David Carlisle wrote: > > > Agreed. Anyone interested in doing a "lint" style transform for checking > > transform portability? > > Is there really anything other than don't use extension functions and > try not to use disable-output-encoding? > Someone mentioned "sort" as a possible source of portability problems? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments - the c, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle |
Month |