Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

> I thought there's more:
> sorting, scripting, ... 

well "scripting" falls into not using extension functions.
sorting etc, yes I agree Mike Kay posted a list of vague areas
earlier I suppose.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued) Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:16:57 +0000 David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:47:31 GMT Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:39:25 +0000 Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:08:45 -0800 (PST) David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:29:41 GMT <= Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) Michael Kay - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:37:57 -0000 Kaganovich, Yevgeniy (Eugene) - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:18:49 -0800 Clark C. Evans - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:18:16 -0500 (EST)

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued)
- Kaganovich, Yevgeniy (Eugene) - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:18:49 -0800
  - Clark C. Evans - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:18:16 -0500 (EST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif	Date	RE: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home