Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portability) From: Joe English <jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:57:09 -0800 |
David Carlisle wrote: > which relates to a question I was going to ask about what do people mean > by a portable stylesheet. > > One that doesn't use features of XSLT declared to be system independent > > or > > One that works uniformly on the XSL engines you have available. Following C terminology, I usually use "portable" to mean the second and "strictly conforming" to mean the first. --Joe English jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Problem with <dd> and </d, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portab, Tobias Reif |
Re: [xsl] Rescuing XSLT from Niche , Jacobs,David B. | Date | Re: [xsl] Rescuing XSLT from Niche , G. Ken Holman |
Month |