<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:51:28 -0000
> By 'extension function' here, I guess that Mike means user-defined
> extension function.

Actually, Saxon currently implements all the Saxon extension functions as if
they were user-written functions, the only special treatment is that the
Saxon namespace is a synonym for the full namespace for the relevant class.
This prevents me doing some optimizations (as in the case of saxon:if()),
but ensures that anything I need to do to support my own extension functions
is also available for user-written functions.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison Thread Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg
Re: [xsl] Defining XSLT functions i, Jeni Tennison Date Re: [xsl] Numbering Grouped Child E, Jeni Tennison
Month