|
Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: "Michael Beddow" <mbnospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:42:19 -0000 |
On Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:47 AM Jeni Tennison wrote: > I also think that it would be hard to explain to > newbies why this particular attribute uses a slightly different > syntax (or rather why they can't use (.. ? .. : ..) in the rest of > their code. > Very true. Think of the way that in 1.0 people try to use AVTs all over the place and get miffed when they find they can't. The less context-specific syntax, the better. Michael ------------------------------------------ Michael Beddow http://www.mbeddow.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg |
| Re: [xsl] [ANN] XSLT tutorial, Henning Behme | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Jeni Tennison |
| Month |