Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

[David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>]

J> as a non-recursive and fairly hacky solution.
Hey I was going to post that:-)
One man's (or woman's) "fairly hacky" is another's "more in the XSLT
style" 

Personally an xsl:append looks deeply suspect to me, if it's required
for functions why isn't it required for the almost identical situation
of binding node sets to variables? If it is also required for that
is "append" the right concept for a declarative language, or should it
be more like
<xsl:variable select="foo[postion('some named construct corresponding 
to an xsl:sort setup') &lt; 5]"/>

David


 

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list