|
Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:46:52 GMT |
> So what about this: Something like that functionality yes, although you'd have to hope that the implementation picked up on that and implemented it directly, caching the sorted list, otherwise it will re-sort the entire list for every element on the list as it applies the $nodes[ filter. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans |
| RE: [xsl] Poluting XSLT??? (Was Re:, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Converting a string to a node, Scerri, Antony (ELSL |
| Month |