Subject: Re: Performance -- Re: [xsl] RE:"*NEVER* use for-each" From: "Anjul Srivastava" <anjul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:56:25 -0800 |
> converting them to MBNA core system, BRILLIANT!), reusable (always good), > reuse (oops, repeated yourself), etc. Good job. reusable = write modules that can be reused reuse = try not to write modules -- try to find modules that others have written and reuse them I did mean them as separate characteristics of a good design and wasn't repeating myself. Thanks for your comments. About the "for-each", well, where does design end and implementation begin? I try to "design" the code for the small functions of the most derived classes that I write! But anyway, that would push me over the off-topic line if I am not already. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Performance -- Re: [xsl] RE:"*N, Patrick, Curtis W | Thread | RE: Performance -- Re: [xsl] RE:"*N, Evan Lenz |
[xsl] Transforming XML doc with nam, Mark Edwards | Date | [xsl] Question on subtotaling, Parinit Girde |
Month |