Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 22:21:22 +0100 |
cutlass wrote: > > so i would say to those arguing the whole XSLT case ( with respect to > new requirements )in detail to step back a bit and lookat your user > requirements, instead of our requirements ( painful as it seems ); xsl > is in a period of adoption which requires characteristics which are > commercially viable. This is ringing a bell... <quote>On the other hand, if xsl:script is not implemented, XSLT might stay reserved for an elite and never really take off.</quote> <quote>How many sites do you think are using XSLT, 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%?</quote> <quote>I would be surprised if this was more than that, and I think we can say that XSLT **IS** still reserved to an elite and you just have to listen on the mailing lists to see that people find it hard to start learning XSLT.</quote> (http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1092&v=1) Eric -- See you in Austin (Knowledge Technologies 2001) http://www.gca.org/attend/2001_conferences/kt_2001/mon.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, cutlass | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Clark C. Evans |
RE: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicl, Diamond, Jason | Date | RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, David LeBlanc |
Month |