Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL equivalent to SQL "unique" From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:35:33 +0100 |
> looks like I've got a syntax or rtf/node-set problem, all methods > descibed there would apply easily if I had entries like > > <set name="1"> > <entry name="a">v1</entry> > <entry namw="b">v2</entry> > </set> > > but all my trials to convert from the below format to that > seem to end at the result-tree-fragment/noed-set boundary. E.g. > I'd like to write > > <xsl:variable name="all"> > <xsl:for-each select="set/*"> > <name><xsl:value-of select="name()"/></name> > </xsl:for-each> > </xsl:variable> > > to convert below data into above format in the variable $all. > But the result is a result tree fragment which cannot be processed > by another for-each loop. I cannot figure a workaround for the > obstacle. The work-around is called the xx:node-set() function, where xx is vendor-specific. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
AW: [xsl] XSL equivalent to SQL "un, Nestel, Frank | Thread | Re: AW: [xsl] XSL equivalent to SQL, Oliver Becker |
RE: [xsl] Nested <xsl:for-each sele, Michael Kay | Date | Re: AW: [xsl] XSL equivalent to SQL, Oliver Becker |
Month |