Subject: RE: [xsl] Transitive closure for XPath From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:01:17 +0100 |
> So we would still have a closure() function but have a notation for > delayed evaluation: > > closure(/closure/node[1], delay::key("myKey", @child)) > The concept you are looking for is "higher-order functions", available in many functional programming languages. The concept is consistent with the XPath conceptual model, but disagreeable to those who want the language to stop short of being a general purpose programming language. Mike Kay Software AG XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Christian Nentwich |
RE: [xsl] <xsl:number from=...> dif, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Variables scope - weird b, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Month |