Subject: Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XPath From: "Christian Nentwich" <c.nentwich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:00:02 +0100 |
> > The concept you are looking for is "higher-order functions", available in > many functional programming languages. The concept is consistent with the > XPath conceptual model, but disagreeable to those who want the language to > stop short of being a general purpose programming language. Well, 'those people' have nothing to complain about, since introducing higher order functions hardly makes XPath computationally complete or general purpose ;) Christian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Francis Norton |
Re: [xsl] I mean self::* doesn't se, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: [xsl] dynamic form attributes a, Michael Kay |
Month |