Subject: Re: [xsl] String match From: Mark Nahabedian <naha@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 08:57:20 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
Peter Flynn writes: > > <start> > > <day>12</day> > > <month>January</month> > > <year>2002</year> > > </start> > > You may find it easier to work with numeric dates if you want to sort > them or otherwise discriminate between them (eg months). The ISO date > format is dd-mm-yyyyThh:mm:ss.ss (capital T in the middle) which will > sort easily. ISO format has the year first so that a "dictionary" sort will also sort chronologically (for dates with the same timezone), e.g. "2002-02-05" for 5 February, 2002. > > <eventRecord start="05-02-2002T" end="14-02-2002T"> > <title>Bla bla</title> > </eventsCalendar> > > (BTW Does anyone know if truncated ISO dates are valid, or must they > be padded with a [possibly misleading] "...00:00:00.00" when no time > is specified?) > > > Hence a mechanism to check that: If the 'start month' is the same - > > to apply eventRecord template but as soon as the 'start month' > > differs then to apply ViewEvents template > > You can byte-slice the string values of attribute CDATA using > the substring-before and substring-after functions. > > ///Peter > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: AW: [xsl] String match, Peter Flynn | Thread | [xsl] String match Revisited, tanz |
AW: [xsl] String match, Julian Reschke | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL FO and change bars, Jim Melton |
Month |