Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks based on Input/Output From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 20:05:36 +0100 |
Ingo Schildmann wrote: > > > I didn't follow the old discussion and maybe I'm missing the point, > but I think the templates > > <xsl:template match="name"> > <a name="{.}" /> > </xsl:template> > > <xsl:template match="connect"> > <dependency by="{input/@block}" on="{output/@block}"/> > </xsl:template> > > would transform your data to the direct representation of message: > > http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/199911/msg00115.html > > So you can use the mentioned stylesheet in a second step. > I feel I should post a health warning that the so-called set-operations outlined in that posting are in fact rubbish - see the next post http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/199911/msg00134.html for details. Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks ba, Ingo Schildmann | Thread | [no subject], Avula, Raj |
Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks ba, Ingo Schildmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based , Kevin_Gutch |
Month |