|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks based on Input/Output From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 20:05:36 +0100 |
Ingo Schildmann wrote:
>
>
> I didn't follow the old discussion and maybe I'm missing the point,
> but I think the templates
>
> <xsl:template match="name">
> <a name="{.}" />
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="connect">
> <dependency by="{input/@block}" on="{output/@block}"/>
> </xsl:template>
>
> would transform your data to the direct representation of message:
>
> http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/199911/msg00115.html
>
> So you can use the mentioned stylesheet in a second step.
>
I feel I should post a health warning that the so-called set-operations
outlined in that posting are in fact rubbish - see the next post
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/199911/msg00134.html
for details.
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks ba, Ingo Schildmann | Thread | [no subject], Avula, Raj |
| Re: [xsl] Re: Ordering of Blocks ba, Ingo Schildmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based , Kevin_Gutch |
| Month |