Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN From: Goetz Bock <bock@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:02:32 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote: > Currently we use XALAN here at work. > > I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most > familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML. Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows. > I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead? I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these special cases) Goetz.
Attachment:
pgp00011.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN, kfricovsky | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Special Characters in URL, Eriksson Magnus | Date | Re: [xsl] Result count in a for-eac, David Carlisle |
Month |