Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
From: James Melton <james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:12:54 -0400
There another issue you may want to consider. If your company is already
using Xalan, you are doing something of a disservice in introducing
another XSLT processor (unless of course you are making a strategic,
company-wide decision and everyone will eventually use your selection).

kfricovsky wrote:
> 
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
> 
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
> 
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
> 
> Does any particlar processor have greater benefits than the other?
> 
> Looking for your objective opinion,
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> -Kevin
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

-- 

____________________________________________________________
James Melton                 CyLogix
609.750.5190                 609.750.5100
james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx     www.cylogix.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread