Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN From: James Melton <james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:12:54 -0400 |
There another issue you may want to consider. If your company is already using Xalan, you are doing something of a disservice in introducing another XSLT processor (unless of course you are making a strategic, company-wide decision and everyone will eventually use your selection). kfricovsky wrote: > > Currently we use XALAN here at work. > > I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most > familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML. > > I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead? > > Does any particlar processor have greater benefits than the other? > > Looking for your objective opinion, > > Thanks... > > -Kevin > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list -- ____________________________________________________________ James Melton CyLogix 609.750.5190 609.750.5100 james.melton@xxxxxxxxxxx www.cylogix.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] <?xml-stylesheet PI, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Three questions on sortin, Tim |
Month |