Subject: Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable unique id From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:35:03 +0100 |
Michael Beddow writes: > Actually, reflecting on what Alexander says, I suppose that's the > answer: do a first pass through, doing nothing but assign id's via > generate-id() as required, and treat the result as the input for all the > other transformations. Now I can enjoy the sunshine again. I am not so sure. If you don't write the transformed result back to disk, its surely an unncessary processing cost? and if you do save the result, the ids are gibberish for subsequent editors sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable u, Michael Beddow | Thread | Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable u, Michael Beddow |
Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable u, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable u, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |