Re: [xsl] Is XSL to XSL the Solution?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Is XSL to XSL the Solution?
From: William Lam <xeenman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
This is what I did.

<x:stylesheet
xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
              xmlns:xsl="anything" version="1.0">
<x:namespace-alias stylesheet-prefix="xsl"
result-prefix="x"/>

<x:template match="/" >
    <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0">
        <xsl:template match="/" />
    </xsl:stylesheet>
</x:template>

</x:stylesheet>

the namespace x nodes are interpreted while the xsl
nodes get copied over ... real easy.

--- Michael Beddow <mbnospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:14 PM
> Eliyahu Hershfeld" wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > I searched the archives and saw a few threads
> about XSL to XSL Where
> > can I find a tutorial or more info?
> 
> This is straightforward enough once you grasp how
> <xsl:namespace-alias/>
> lets you jump over your own shadow namespace-wise.
> It's covered in Mike
> Kay's book (p 233-36 of the 1st edition) and a
> search on
> "namespace-alias" in other places ought to turn up
> further pointers.
> 
> Michael
>
---------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Beddow   http://www.mbeddow.net/
> XML and the Humanities page: 
> http://xml.lexilog.org.uk/
>
---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive: 
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread