Subject: Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 20:35:26 +0100 |
> Thus, in the following document, there is, to my knowledge (such as it is), no > way to differentiate the two 'spam' elements from different namespaces > (at least without including enough of the ancestors to get back to a > qualified global) in an XSL stylesheet. Am I missing something? they are not spam from different namespaces. they are both spam elements that are not in any namespace. If you want to specify a rule for this spam element when it appears as a child of the test1 namespace, then something like <xsl:template match="t1:*//spam"> may surfice, or if you need to protect against t2 elements being nested in t1 elements, then a slightly more complicated expression involving namespace-uri(). David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, Evan Lenz | Thread | RE: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, Chris Bayes |
Re: [xsl] A Counter Variable in XSL, Grant Mc Auley | Date | [xsl] Basic: Diferrence between XSL, Paulo Henrique S. Be |
Month |