Subject: Re: Schemas in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 request?) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:30:20 +0100 |
Perhaps it's just the Lisp programmer in me but the metacircularity asthetic seems to me to suggest that one should be able to write an XSLT transformation which can validate a document against a schema. If one can't then the language is either insufficiently powerful or has be fettered or crippled in some inappropriate way. you probably could for the structural part of schema (cf schematron) ie the "complex" types but you can't really support the "simple" datatypes without extending XSLT as that requires (at least) regexp support, date handling and other primitive operations that certainly you could in theory code in XSLT but you don't really want to. See Francis Norton's post earlier today (or rather yesterday now) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Schemas in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [, Mark Nahabedian | Thread | RE: Schemas in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [, Chris Bayes |
Re: [xsl] schema-1 (was something a, David Carlisle | Date | RE: Schemas in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [, Chris Bayes |
Month |