Subject: [xsl] performace diffence in MSXSL:SCRIPT blocks From: "Todd Binder" <todd_binder@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:18:18 -0500 |
is there a difference in performance between the following? 1) using CDATA <msxsl:script language="VBScript" implements-prefix="user"> <![CDATA[ '--------------------------------------------------------------------- 'converts current date to YYYYMMDD format function current_date() current_date = cstr(date()) end function ]]> </msxsl:script> 2) no CDATA <msxsl:script language="VBScript" implements-prefix="user"> '--------------------------------------------------------------------- 'converts current date to YYYYMMDD format function current_date() current_date = cstr(date()) end function </msxsl:script> obviously, using the CDATA helps when you are looking at your XSL file from within IE, but if it is going to cause a performance slowdown, it wouldn't be worth it. - todd Todd Binder todd_binder@xxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] difference between MSXSL:SCRI, Todd Binder | Thread | Re: [xsl] performace diffence in MS, David Carlisle |
[xsl] difference between MSXSL:SCRI, Todd Binder | Date | Re: [xsl] performace diffence in MS, David Carlisle |
Month |