Subject: Re: [xsl] question about implements-prefix From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:25:15 GMT |
> Just thought it might be worth mentioning the problem that the > namespace URIs are resolved relative to the namespace declaration. Xpath 1.0 specifies that but it is arguably at odds with the namespace rec in doing so (which specifies a string comparision) and this was one of the reasons that w3c issued an edict that the behaviour of a processor on relative uri references used as namespace names was explictly undefined. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] question about implements, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] question about implements, Don Bruey |
RE: [xsl] Multiple documents output, Andrey Astakhov | Date | [xsl] whitespaces, Pep Coll |
Month |