Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath: all elements with only non-parent children with identical style attr From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:39:55 -0600 |
> No that wouldn't work, if I remember correctly from my electronics study > > not(A) and not(B) equals not(A or B) > > I think its called the laws of Morgan or something > so in your case that would lead to I believe you're thinking of DeMorgan's law, which states essentially that. However, if I can recall correctly, for DeMorgan's law to apply, the operations in question all have to be commutative and it's not clear to me that that is true for XSLT in general? The latter is actually an interesting question, since if you can show that all the XSLT operations meet the tests for forming a group then you know you have all other kinds of capabilities with the language... Perhaps someone who's days of heavy algebra aren't 20 years behind them might care to expand? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XPath: all elements with , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XPath: all elements with , Mark Nahabedian |
Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Dumb questions fr, Mike Ferrando | Date | RE: [xsl] Dumb questions from a new, Chris Bayes |
Month |