Subject: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 question From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:08:33 +0100 (CET) |
I have noticed that as editors there are listed 4 people from XML Query WG 3 people from XSL WG If there is some point reised which requires voting, what is the procedure? Does it mean that votes are simpli counted. I am browsing through the spec and have feeling that XPath went the way of XML Schema: databases are much more important than text processing And BTW: WHERE ARE REGULAR EXPRESSIONS ??????????, which were promissed : http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20req : 3. Must Support String Matching Using Regular Expressions -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: XPath incompatibilities, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, Michael Kay |
[no subject], Miloslav Nic | Date | Re: [xsl] How to add a top level el, David Carlisle |
Month |