Subject: RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 question From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:01:00 +0100 (CET) |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Michael Kay wrote: Thanks for your explanations, I have spent last couple of hours browsing the specs and I have found quite a few things to my liking (of course not the breaking of XPath 1.0 compatibility) Last few days I have had quite harsh headaches, which are unfortunately not alcohol related, and so I am quite prone to jump to paranoic explanations. Fortunately, next two weeks I will have better things to do than read specifications , but I am looking forward to January when I will give it some grilling. -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, David Carlisle |
Month |