Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0 From: "Zarella Rendon" <zarella@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 21:51:11 -0600 |
Hi David, I monitor the XPath list for the XSL WG and I have not seen any postings from you. Please resend your comments and copy me directly so that I can be sure they get posted. Thanks. Zarella Rendon For the W3C XSL WG zarella@xxxxxxxxx > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David > Rosenborg > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:21 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0 > > > Mike Kay wrote: > > > It's good to see comments on the drafts, but please do send > your reactions > > to the official feedback address. Some members of both working > groups read > > this list but not everyone does; and it's really best if what > reaches the > > groups isn't filtered by people like me who will inevitably want to pass > > some comments on and not others. > > Hmm, maybe it's just me, but I think it's pretty strange if not > every member, > working actively with XSLT/XPath, monitor this list to at least > some degree. > > (BTW, I sent a copy to the XPath comments address, but it never showed up, > at least not in the archives, maybe there is some latency and/or moderator > sitting in between?) > > Cheers > > </David> > > David Rosenborg > Pantor Engineering AB > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2., David Rosenborg | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2., Max Froumentin |
Re: [xsl] even and odds, Yan Zhu | Date | [xsl] RE:, Zarella Rendon |
Month |