Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0 From: Max Froumentin <mf@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:48:41 +0100 |
You wrote: > (BTW, I sent a copy to the XPath comments address, but it never showed up, > at least not in the archives, maybe there is some latency and/or moderator > sitting in between?) I am the moderator, and it's true that I'm sometimes late forwarding messages to the list, especially when I'm away from a computer. But there is a way around: if you are subscribed to the mailing list you message will make it through directly. My moderating posts from non-subscribers is a way to filter spam out. Max. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2., Zarella Rendon | Thread | Re: [xsl] Should "//ename[n]" mean , Jonathan Robie |
Re: [xsl] Simplest way to return an, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Functional trim(), Adriano Rodrigues Fe |
Month |