Subject: RE: [xsl] following vs following-sibling From: "McKeever, Marty" <marty.mckeever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:25:07 -0500 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > There's absolutely a difference between the following-sibling > and following > axes (as any reference book will tell you :-). > > If they're not working as expected, why not post the relevant > bit of your > source document? with the offending bit of stylesheet so we > can explain > what it's really doing and why you should expect that. After my earlier post i did run a test case and found that i was wrong and posted too hastily. Following-sibling:: worked exactly as it should have. So now i'm trying to remember which stylesheet gave me the wrong impression to begin with so i can go see what i did wrong. I suspect i just typed following by mistake when i meant following::sibling. I remember adding some convoluted IF statements to exclude the non-siblings... sigh... i'll find it sooner or later ;) Thanks! Marty XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following vs following-si, Yan Zhu | Thread | [xsl] [OT} XML Documentation spec, Eric Vitiello |
[xsl] Re: Functional trim(), Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Splitting non-delimited s, David Carlisle |
Month |