RE: [xsl] following vs following-sibling

Subject: RE: [xsl] following vs following-sibling
From: "McKeever, Marty" <marty.mckeever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:25:07 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> There's absolutely a difference between the following-sibling 
> and following 
> axes (as any reference book will tell you :-).
> If they're not working as expected, why not post the relevant 
> bit of your 
> source document? with the offending bit of stylesheet so we 
> can explain 
> what it's really doing and why you should expect that. 

After my earlier post i did run a test case and found that i was wrong and
posted too hastily.  Following-sibling:: worked exactly as it should have.
So now i'm trying to remember which stylesheet gave me the wrong impression
to begin with so i can go see what i did wrong. I suspect i just typed
following by mistake when i meant following::sibling.  I remember adding
some convoluted IF statements to exclude the non-siblings... sigh... i'll
find it sooner or later ;)

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread