Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:47:31 GMT |
> We're going to get 1000 people a week falling into the trap well, 'tis your fault, no? (why can't . follow the inner bound variable from the for, like it does for / or for fo-each?) > Congratulations on being the first. I believe it is my main role on this list to generate errors for you and jeni to correct... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] The hard cocktail of sequence, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] How to pick and choose no, Jeni Tennison |
Month |