Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:44:34 +0000 |
David C. wrote: >> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is >> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes. >> So if you did: > > more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents > (in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are > not comparable with orderings based on an axes. Coo. Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] How to know if an attribute i, Paul Terray |
[xsl] How to know if an attribute i, Paul Terray | Date | Re: [xsl] How to know if an attribu, David Carlisle |
Month |