|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:45:43 GMT |
> Does anyone on this list care that "<<", when used in XSLT, would have to be
> written as "a<<b"?
not too much
a) it's only twice as bad as < and not too many people have complained
about that.
b) As with < you'd almost always be able to easily restructure your
query in terms of >> if it bothered you.
c) Anyone rash enough to use an XML editor to type their XSLT files
instead of using emacs can presumably type << anyway.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0, Evan D. Lenz | Thread | RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0, Evan Lenz |
| RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0, Ed Blachman | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0, David Carlisle |
| Month |