Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e From: Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:31:01 +0100 |
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > d-o-e really isn't needed for this at all (and using it just makes the > stylesheet fail n situations like mozilla where d-o-e isn't supported) I'd rather write "... where d-o-e can't work". Your formulation somehow suggests that the processor in Mozilla is incomplete or defective, even for people who know that the standard does not mandate support for d-o-e, and that they should switch to another processor/browser which has this fixed. I'd rather like to have newbies indoctrinated that even support for d-o-e can't help if the result is not serialized. After all, we don't want to force every application using XSLT to do an intermediate serialization step just because IE does it an "it has become common practice..." Regards J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Nesbitt, David | Thread | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, David Carlisle |
RE: Regular expression functions (W, Marc Portier | Date | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Robert Stuart |
Month |