Subject: RE: [xsl] CALS tables From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 08:55:58 -0000 |
>I'm afraid I can't say, although I rather doubt it (the OASIS/CALS table >model is altogether pretty fierce). I just lifted it, very gratefully, from >Norm Walsh, on the assumption that most was better than none (and I had no >basis to complain considering how much work he was sparing me). Basically >all I did was reverse-engineer his efforts to the point where the module >could be portable. Yes, but its soooo close. Maybe I will have a go at adding the functionality (although I dont fancy my chances :) >Since you seem to have worked it out in wd-xsl, I actually think you're in >a better position than I am, at this point, to contribute to Norm's efforts >if you find areas that still need work. (And if you do, please share: he did.) > >Cheers, >Wendell The wd-xsl version was written by someone else here and involves mostly javascript (and <xsl:value-of/>'s ;) which doesnt really help when trying to write a pure xsl version... cheers andrew === XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] CALS tables, Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:include, Jason Macki |
Re: [xsl] Grouping conditions, Joerg Heinicke | Date | RE: [xsl] tag minimisation, Julian Reschke |
Month |