Subject: Re: [xsl] Fixing &lt;b&gt; From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:03:36 GMT |
> Conceptually, I want to parse the XML and copy the resulting > nodes to the result tree. But if the result tree is being serialized to XML, > I don't mind the processor being clever and bypassing the parse/serialize > operations by copying the raw XML straight to the serial output file." would you require the processor cleverness to include getting namespaces right, if so probably parsing and re-serialising is probably about the best you can do. In theory this is already available as document('data:text/xml,<foo/>') > That doesn't deal with the HTML variant of the problem, though .... No, but you could do document('data:text/html,<br>') so long as you knew the html parser used on your text/html input streams returned things as an "instance of the data model" to use xpath2 terminoligy:-) the data:mime-type,string URI scheme is a standard scheme (and supported by netscape since the beginning of time, I think) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Fixing &lt;b&gt;, naha | Thread | [xsl] XML string copying w/o d-o-e , Mike Brown |
Re: [xsl] match something located i, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] problem with transforming, Uslu, Cihan Y (MED) |
Month |