Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: legacy embedded HTML From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 18:44:35 -0700 |
If this is true, then why are trying to transform it using XSLT? Why not use something that works better with asci>? why do you feel the need for xslt?"R" == Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
R> Hi, Are you paying for ths feed?? They should process the crap R> out first.
Forgive my sounding like a broken CD player, but in the real world, function prevails over form almost every time ;)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: legacy embedded HTML, Gary Lawrence Murphy | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: legacy embedded HTML, Gary Lawrence Murphy |
Re: [xsl] mystery #3: rendering emb, Gary Lawrence Murphy | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT Processing Model Que, Peter Davis |
Month |