Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study

Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study
From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:25:54 -0700
Hi,

Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:55:08 -0600
From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study
Reply-To: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, this is true. Although it is voluntery to subscribe to this or any
other list... so the volume is not a prob, as far as I can see. But about

It's a problem if you care about alienating people who might be valuable
contributors to the discussion. One of the people I know who refuses to
subscribe is Uche Ogbuji, whose name may be known to many of you. FWIW.

Is the problem more that there are alot of on-topic, but very basic questions that can (should...) found in FAQs or books?

This list has not been plagued at with off-topic subjects like many other lists. Just look at how the list administrator is actively monitoring this thread. It shows a great deal of concern for off-topic threads. It also shows he has not made up his mind whether this is off-topic.

Content management affects many (most?) of us directly. I wonder how many people are rolling their own systems to fit their particular XSL(t) needs?? It seems to me that the two go hand in hand.

best,
-Rob



XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread