Subject: Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL doc name in comment From: Mike Ferrando <mikeferrando@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:58:35 -0700 (PDT) |
--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > p.s. What is strange is that SAXON obviously knows the file names > it > > is processing, > > It isn't obvious that the XML it is processing has a name. Both the > source XML and the stylesheet might come from standard input > stream, or > from a stream of sax events or.... Dear David C., Even given what you have said, isn't it true that I must call up a file name whether it be from the command line, or with xsl:import or xsl:include, etc.? And if so, then why not capture those ?.xsl names for the comment either at their location or globally? Again, SAXON has the name/path anyway. > Every Xpath node does however have a base URI associated, but XSLT > gives > no standard access to that information. saxon has a saxon:systemId > extension to get at it though.... ??? <saxon:systemID select="document('')"/> Sincerely, Mike Ferrando Washington, DC __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Output of a Jscript varia, Stuart Celarier | Date | [xsl] Javascript looping expression, Zoe Peng |
Month |