Subject: Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL doc name in comment From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 19:22:34 +0100 |
> Dear David C., > Even given what you have said, isn't it true that I must call up a > file name whether it be from the command line, An XSLT system doesn't have to have access to a file, it could accept standard in, as in echo "<xxx/>" | xt input.xml - actually I don't think saxon does accept stdin, looking at its documentation, but if called via its api rather than the command line then you can do things that are logically equivalent to this. > And if so, then why not capture those ?.xsl names the real reason I suppose is that saxon implements the xslt spec (and while MK is now editor of XSLT he can't be blamed much for the facilities that are in or not in XSLT 1:-)) > <saxon:systemID select="document('')"/> Nope http://saxon.sourceforge.net/saxon6.5.2/extensions.html#systemid <xsl:for-each select="document('')"> <xsl:value-of select="systemId()"/> </xsl:for-each> David (untested) _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, Mike Ferrando | Thread | Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] Javascript looping expression, Zoe Peng | Date | RE: [xsl] Anyone have benchmarks fo, Stuart Celarier |
Month |