Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")

[Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 12:11  PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:

> Hi Sara,
<snip/>
> It's
> good to raise those concerns now, while the WGs are still considering
> which parts of, for example, XPath 2.0 are really necessary. I
> encourage you, and indeed everyone, to write to
> public-qt-comments@xxxxxx describing what parts you find particularly
> hard to understand and which parts you think are unnecessary.

I'd also add to Jeni's note that if you (or anyone else) are in favor of a 
conformance level for XSLT 2.0 that does not require XML Schema validation,
 we would like to hear about it, including any specific requirements for 
what such a conformance level would entail. You may have a better chance 
of success if you put your hopes in a conformance level, rather than 
trying to fight the inclusion of XML Schemas altogether.

Evan Lenz
(speaking for himself only, not for the XSL WG)


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list